On 21.08.2017 22:35, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> The index in kvm->vcpus array and vcpu->vcpu_id are very different
> things. Comparing struct kvm_vcpu pointers is a sure way to know.
>
> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrc...@redhat.com>
> ---
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> index 408ef06638fc..9d4b69b766ec 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> @@ -797,7 +797,6 @@ void vgic_v3_dispatch_sgi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 reg)
> u16 target_cpus;
> u64 mpidr;
> int sgi, c;
> - int vcpu_id = vcpu->vcpu_id;
> bool broadcast;
>
> sgi = (reg & ICC_SGI1R_SGI_ID_MASK) >> ICC_SGI1R_SGI_ID_SHIFT;
> @@ -821,7 +820,7 @@ void vgic_v3_dispatch_sgi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 reg)
> break;
>
> /* Don't signal the calling VCPU */
> - if (broadcast && c == vcpu_id)
> + if (broadcast && c_vcpu == vcpu)
> continue;
>
> if (!broadcast) {
>
Yes, this looks correct to me.
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
--
Thanks,
David
