> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 10:09 AM
> To: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
> Cc: LKML <[email protected]>; Stephen Hemminger
> <[email protected]>; Simon Xiao <[email protected]>; KY
> Srinivasan <[email protected]>; Haiyang Zhang
> <[email protected]>; Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>; Peter
> Zijlstra <[email protected]>; Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-
> foundation.org>; Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>; H. Peter Anvin
> <[email protected]>; Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]>; Brian Gerst
> <[email protected]>; Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>; Andy Lutomirski
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/idt: Unbreak MS HyperV hypercall vector install
> 
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 01:19:52 -0700
> > "Thomas Gleixner" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > The rework of the IDT setup changed the way how unused system gates
> are
> > > accounted. At the end of the gate initialization all unused gates in the
> > > system vector area are set to the spurios handler and marked as used for
> > > consistency reasons.
> > >
> > > Marking them as used breaks MS HyperV because it installs its hypercall
> > > vector after that point and the installation is guarded by the bit in the
> > > used_vectors map. So the hyperv vector stays directed to the spurious
> > > interrupt handler.
> > >
> > > Leave them marked as unused again and unbreak HyperV that way.
> > >
> > > Fixes: dc20b2d52653 ("x86/idt: Move interrupt gate initialization to IDT
> > > code")
> > > Reported-by: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> >
> > This fixes it, thanks.
> >
> > Tested-by: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
> 
> What's the reason that the vector is not set up early in the boot process?

No specific reason other than that was the way I had coded it up initially. I 
will send in a patch to
fix that.

Regards,

K. Y 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>       tglx
> 

Reply via email to