On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Paul Moore <p...@paul-moore.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Kyeongdon Kim <kyeongdon....@lge.com> wrote: >> During random test as own device to check slub account, >> we found some slack memory from hashtab_node(kmalloc-64). >> By using kzalloc(), middle of test result like below: >> allocated size 240768 >> request size 45144 >> slack size 195624 >> allocation count 3762 >> >> So, we want to use kmem_cache_zalloc() and that >> can reduce memory size 52byte(slack size/alloc count) per each struct. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kyeongdon Kim <kyeongdon....@lge.com> >> --- >> security/selinux/ss/hashtab.c | 17 +++++++++++++++-- >> security/selinux/ss/hashtab.h | 4 ++++ >> security/selinux/ss/services.c | 4 ++++ >> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > This seems reasonale, but I'm going to refrain from merging this until > after the merge window closes.
I just merged this into selinux/next, thanks for your patience. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com
