On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 04:24:18PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 06:37:39PM -0500, Miguel Bernal Marin wrote:
> > Some warning were showed by objtool using gcc 7.2.0
> > 
> > kernel/locking/rwsem.o: warning: objtool: up_read()+0x11: call without 
> > frame pointer save/setup
> > kernel/locking/rwsem.o: warning: objtool: up_write()+0x17: call without 
> > frame pointer save/setup
> > kernel/locking/rwsem.o: warning: objtool: downgrade_write()+0x22: call 
> > without frame pointer save/setup
> > 
> > which means gcc placed an inline asm function and its call instruction 
> > before
> > the frame pointer setup.
> >  
> > This series forces a stack frame to be created before the call instruction
> > by listing the stack pointer as an output operand in the inline asm 
> > statement.
> > 
> > Also to be easy to maintain and understand the operands from the extended
> > assembler instructions were converted to named operands.
> 
> I've got a patch going around which will change the way we do this, so
> you'll probably need to do a v3 after my patch gets merged.  I'll add
> you to cc for the next revision.
> 

Ok, I will wait to see your changes merged.

Thanks.


> -- 
> Josh

-- 
Regards,

Miguel Bernal Marin                     Open Source Technology Center
https://clearlinux.org                              Intel Corporation

Reply via email to