On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 13:44:28 -0500 Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Yeah, it's almost ready. At this point, I've addressed all the comments > except for: > > - PATCH v2 25/40] tracing: Add support for dynamic tracepoints > > which I need to do a little bit of research on to figure out what > exactly I need to do there. Let me know if you need any help. > > I was also kind of looking for a couple patches from you to fold in > which you had mentioned you were going to send for: > > - [PATCH v2 35/40] tracing: Reverse the order event_mutex/trace_types_lock > are taken OK, I have a stand alone patch that you don't need to fold in that does this properly. I tested the crap out of it (missed a few places), but should be good. I'll send that netx. > - [PATCH v2 40/40] tracing: Add trace_event_buffer_reserve() variant that > allows recursion I have this working too, but want to test it a little more before sending. Once I do, you can add both patches ahead of your series. I may just apply them to my tree now and start running them through my formal tests. > > I've been using the trace_recursive_lock() patch you posted in place of > the latter and it's working fine. :-) Thanks! -- Steve
