On 26.09.17, Mark Rutland wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 01:45:37PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > We stumbled over a change in linux-next that has ABI implications for arm64 > > and, as far as we can tell, has not been reviewed: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/arch/arm64/kernel?id=fb7ff3f8721b87bf078868c9a252fa0cf71a47c2 > > > > ("fb7ff3f8721b cpuinfo: implement sysfs nodes for arm64") > > > Please can you drop this from your tree until we've had a chance to review > > it properly? If Felix can repost it as above, then we can get the discussion > > started because, aside from this email, we have concerns about exactly what > > is being exposed to userspace here. > > Seconded. > > Experience with the existing /proc/cpuinfo shows that this needs *very* > careful review. > > I've worked on arm64's /proc/cpuinfo, and I'd appreciate being Cc'd on > future postings of this series. I'd also recommend that future postings > are also Cc'd to linux-arch (and maybe linux-api) so that the interface > is reviewed by a larger set of relevant parties.
I will do that! > > Thanks, > Mark.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
