On 09/26/2017 06:49 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Switch to using the recently added interrupt simulator for dummy irqs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <b...@bgdev.pl>
Thanks for doing this.
[...]
> static int iio_dummy_evgen_create(void)
> {
> - int ret, i;
> + int ret;
>
> iio_evgen = kzalloc(sizeof(*iio_evgen), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!iio_evgen)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - iio_evgen->base = irq_alloc_descs(-1, 0, IIO_EVENTGEN_NO, 0);
> - if (iio_evgen->base < 0) {
> - ret = iio_evgen->base;
> - kfree(iio_evgen);
> + ret = irq_sim_init(&iio_evgen->irq_sim, IIO_EVENTGEN_NO);
> + if (ret)
What happened to the kfree(iio_evgen)?
> return ret;
> - }
> - iio_evgen->chip.name = iio_evgen_name;
> - iio_evgen->chip.irq_mask = &iio_dummy_event_irqmask;
> - iio_evgen->chip.irq_unmask = &iio_dummy_event_irqunmask;
> - for (i = 0; i < IIO_EVENTGEN_NO; i++) {
> - irq_set_chip(iio_evgen->base + i, &iio_evgen->chip);
> - irq_set_handler(iio_evgen->base + i, &handle_simple_irq);
> - irq_modify_status(iio_evgen->base + i,
> - IRQ_NOREQUEST | IRQ_NOAUTOEN,
> - IRQ_NOPROBE);
> - }
> - init_irq_work(&iio_evgen->handler.work, iio_dummy_work_handler);
> +
> + iio_evgen->base = irq_sim_irqnum(&iio_evgen->irq_sim, 0);
I saw you introduced irq_sim_baseirq(), to get rid of ->base. But as far as
I can see the only remaining places where we need the base is to do the
reverse lookup from IRQ to index. It would be nice if the irq_sim had a
function for that, then we wouldn't have to know about the base at all.
> mutex_init(&iio_evgen->lock);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -132,15 +79,17 @@ int iio_dummy_evgen_get_irq(void)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> mutex_lock(&iio_evgen->lock);
> - for (i = 0; i < IIO_EVENTGEN_NO; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < IIO_EVENTGEN_NO; i++) {
> if (!iio_evgen->inuse[i]) {
> - ret = iio_evgen->base + i;
> + ret = irq_sim_irqnum(&iio_evgen->irq_sim, i);
> iio_evgen->inuse[i] = true;
> break;
> }
> + }
> mutex_unlock(&iio_evgen->lock);
> if (i == IIO_EVENTGEN_NO)
> return -ENOMEM;
> +
> return ret;
> }
