On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 11:33:44 +0200
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> * Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Jprobe actually doesn't need to disable IRQs while calling
> > handlers, because Documentation/kprobes.txt says:
> > 
> > -----
> >  Probe handlers are run with preemption disabled.  Depending on the
> >  architecture and optimization state, handlers may also run with
> >  interrupts disabled (e.g., kretprobe handlers and optimized kprobe
> >  handlers run without interrupt disabled on x86/x86-64).
> > -----
> > 
> > So let's remove IRQ disabling from jprobes too.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c |    2 --
> >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> > index b48e0efd668e..bd36f3c33cd0 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> > @@ -1099,8 +1099,6 @@ int setjmp_pre_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct 
> > pt_regs *regs)
> >      * raw stack chunk with redzones:
> >      */
> >     __memcpy(kcb->jprobes_stack, (kprobe_opcode_t *)addr, 
> > MIN_STACK_SIZE(addr));
> > -   regs->flags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_IF;
> > -   trace_hardirqs_off();
> >     regs->ip = (unsigned long)(jp->entry);
> >  
> >     /*
> 
> Could you please also do a patch that disables jprobes permanently, in 
> preparation 
> of eventually removing them later?

Would you mean introducing CONFIG_JPROBE_API and cut APIs out,
or just adding "__deprecated" for each API?

Thank you,

> 
> Thanks,
> 
>       Ingo


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>

Reply via email to