On 10/06/2017 02:36 PM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> On Fri,  6 Oct 2017 13:19:45 -0400
> Jason Baron <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> If the 'arat' cpu flag is set, then the conditionals in intel_idle()
>> that guard calling tick_broadcast_enter()/exit() will never be true.
>> Use static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARAT) to create a fast path to replace
>> the conditional.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Jacob Pan <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  drivers/idle/intel_idle.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
>> index 5dc7ea4..5db5e31 100644
>> --- a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
>> +++ b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
>> @@ -913,8 +913,7 @@ static __cpuidle int intel_idle(struct
>> cpuidle_device *dev, struct cpuidle_state *state =
>> &drv->states[index]; unsigned long eax = flg2MWAIT(state->flags);
>>      unsigned int cstate;
>> -
>> -    cstate = (((eax) >> MWAIT_SUBSTATE_SIZE) &
>> MWAIT_CSTATE_MASK) + 1;
>> +    bool uninitialized_var(tick);
>>  
>>      /*
>>       * NB: if CPUIDLE_FLAG_TLB_FLUSHED is set, this idle
>> transition @@ -923,12 +922,19 @@ static __cpuidle int
>> intel_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>>       * useful with this knowledge.
>>       */
>>  
>> -    if (!(lapic_timer_reliable_states & (1 << (cstate))))
>> -            tick_broadcast_enter();
>> +    if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARAT)) {
>> +            cstate = (((eax) >> MWAIT_SUBSTATE_SIZE) &
>> +                            MWAIT_CSTATE_MASK) + 1;
>> +            tick = false;
>> +            if (!(lapic_timer_reliable_states & (1 <<
>> (cstate)))) {
>> +                    tick = true;
>> +                    tick_broadcast_enter();
>> +            }
>> +    }
>>  
>>      mwait_idle_with_hints(eax, ecx);
>>  
>> -    if (!(lapic_timer_reliable_states & (1 << (cstate))))
>> +    if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARAT) && tick)
>>              tick_broadcast_exit();
>>  
>>      return index;
> 
> Seems better to have a function pointer set up at init time to select
> whether we do tick_broadcast or not (two functions). There is no need to
> check CPU feature on every entry.
> 

Hi,

static_cpu_has() uses alternatives patching, so the cpu feature is not
tested on every entry. With the arat flag set you just have two nops in
the straight-line code path with this patch.

Thanks,

-Jason

Reply via email to