On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 08:22:58PM +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
> On Dienstag, 10. Oktober 2017 06:49:54 CEST Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Hi Milian,
> > 
> > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 10:33:10PM +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/sort.c b/tools/perf/util/sort.c
> > > index 006d10a0dc96..6f3d109078a3 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/util/sort.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/sort.c
> > > @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ char *hist_entry__get_srcline(struct hist_entry *he)
> > > 
> > >   if (!map)
> > >   
> > >           return SRCLINE_UNKNOWN;
> > > 
> > > - return get_srcline(map->dso, map__rip_2objdump(map, he->ip),
> > > + return get_srcline(map->dso, map__objdump_2mem(map, he->ip),
> > > 
> > >                      he->ms.sym, true, true);
> > 
> > I'm not sure this is right.  IIRC hist_entry->ip is a relative IP so
> > it needs to be changed for objdump use.  Maybe there's some bug on
> > translating the address but it seems that the original code is
> > correct.  And this change breaks srcline for my test program (which is
> > a PIE).
> 
> Odd, I'll have to look at that. But this is imo unrelated to the rest of the 
> patch series. So maybe we skip this one and apply the others. Assuming those 
> other patches are OK by now?

Yep, for the patch 1 - 15:

  Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>

Thanks,
Namhyung

Reply via email to