On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 10:58:47 +0200 > Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:43:25 -0700 >> Kees Cook <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list >> > pointer to all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() >> > and from_timer() to pass the timer pointer explicitly. >> > >> > Cc: Sebastian Ott <[email protected]> >> > Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <[email protected]> >> > Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]> >> > Cc: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]> >> > Cc: [email protected] >> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> >> > --- >> > drivers/s390/cio/device.c | 8 ++++---- >> > drivers/s390/cio/device.h | 2 ++ >> > drivers/s390/cio/device_fsm.c | 10 ++++------ >> > drivers/s390/cio/eadm_sch.c | 9 ++++----- >> > 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) >> >> Applied to s390/linux:feature branch. Thanks. > > On second though, this will be postponed until the first merge of > the s390/linux tree in 4.15 merge window has been done. I do not > want to rebase the features branch and without the base timer code > the branch will not compile. But be assured the patch is accepted > and queued, just not visible yet.
Okay, thanks! -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security
