> On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 20:17:02 +0800
> JianKang Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> The function register_kretprobe is used to initialize a struct
>> kretprobe and allocate a list table for kprobe instance.
>> However,in this function, there is a memory leak.
>>
>> The test case:
>>
>> static struct kretprobe rp;
>> struct  kretprobe *rps[10]={&rp ,&rp ,&rp ,
>> &rp ,&rp ,&rp ,&rp ,&rp ,&rp,&rp};
> 
> What ? this is buggy code. you must not list same kretprobe.
> But, year, since register_kprobe() already has similar protection against
> reusing, register_kretprobe() should do so.
> 
> [..]
>>      raw_spin_lock_init(&rp->lock);
>> +
>> +    if (!hlist_empty(&rp->free_instances))
>> +            return -EBUSY;
>> +
> 
> Hmm, but can you use check_kprobe_rereg() before raw_spin_lock_init()?
> If user reuses rp after it starts, rp->lock can already be used.

Hmm, your advice is very good, we can use check_kprobe_rereg() at 
the beginning of the register_kretprobe();

For example:

int register_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
{
        int ret = 0;
        struct kretprobe_instance *inst;
        int i;
        void *addr;

        ret = check_kprobe_rereg(&rp->kp);
        if (ret)
                return ret;

Thank you!
 

Reply via email to