On Oct 22, 2017, at 18:53, NeilBrown <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> it is only ever set to '1', so we can just assume that and remove the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <[email protected]>

> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c |   15 ++-------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c 
> b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
> index cb826e9e840e..f719dc05e1ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
> @@ -121,15 +121,9 @@ ldlm_flock_destroy(struct ldlm_lock *lock, enum 
> ldlm_mode mode, __u64 flags)
>  * It is also responsible for splitting a lock if a portion of the lock
>  * is released.
>  *
> - * If \a first_enq is 0 (ie, called from ldlm_reprocess_queue):
> - *   - blocking ASTs have already been sent
> - *
> - * If \a first_enq is 1 (ie, called from ldlm_lock_enqueue):
> - *   - blocking ASTs have not been sent yet, so list of conflicting locks
> - *     would be collected and ASTs sent.
>  */
> static int ldlm_process_flock_lock(struct ldlm_lock *req, __u64 *flags,
> -                                int first_enq, enum ldlm_error *err,
> +                                enum ldlm_error *err,
>                                  struct list_head *work_list)
> {
>       struct ldlm_resource *res = req->l_resource;
> @@ -197,11 +191,6 @@ static int ldlm_process_flock_lock(struct ldlm_lock 
> *req, __u64 *flags,
>                       if (!ldlm_flocks_overlap(lock, req))
>                               continue;
> 
> -                     if (!first_enq) {
> -                             reprocess_failed = 1;
> -                             continue;
> -                     }
> -
>                       if (*flags & LDLM_FL_BLOCK_NOWAIT) {
>                               ldlm_flock_destroy(req, mode, *flags);
>                               *err = -EAGAIN;
> @@ -605,7 +594,7 @@ ldlm_flock_completion_ast(struct ldlm_lock *lock, __u64 
> flags, void *data)
>               /* We need to reprocess the lock to do merges or splits
>                * with existing locks owned by this process.
>                */
> -             ldlm_process_flock_lock(lock, &noreproc, 1, &err, NULL);
> +             ldlm_process_flock_lock(lock, &noreproc, &err, NULL);
>       }
>       unlock_res_and_lock(lock);
>       return rc;
> 
> 

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel Corporation







Reply via email to