On Oct 22, 2017, at 18:53, NeilBrown <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 'work_list' is only set to NULL, and is never used.
> So discard it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <[email protected]>

> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c |    5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c 
> b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
> index f719dc05e1ea..766653b4d8a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
> @@ -123,8 +123,7 @@ ldlm_flock_destroy(struct ldlm_lock *lock, enum ldlm_mode 
> mode, __u64 flags)
>  *
>  */
> static int ldlm_process_flock_lock(struct ldlm_lock *req, __u64 *flags,
> -                                enum ldlm_error *err,
> -                                struct list_head *work_list)
> +                                enum ldlm_error *err)
> {
>       struct ldlm_resource *res = req->l_resource;
>       struct ldlm_namespace *ns = ldlm_res_to_ns(res);
> @@ -594,7 +593,7 @@ ldlm_flock_completion_ast(struct ldlm_lock *lock, __u64 
> flags, void *data)
>               /* We need to reprocess the lock to do merges or splits
>                * with existing locks owned by this process.
>                */
> -             ldlm_process_flock_lock(lock, &noreproc, &err, NULL);
> +             ldlm_process_flock_lock(lock, &noreproc, &err);
>       }
>       unlock_res_and_lock(lock);
>       return rc;
> 
> 

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel Corporation







Reply via email to