Hi Andrew, On 01.11.2017 13:31, Andrew Lunn wrote: >> Yes, I did it the same way as the existing code did for phy->phy_led_triggers >> for reasons of both consistency and also to be on the safe side because >> maybe there is some non-obvious reason why it has to be freed >> explicitly (?). > > Hi Maciej > > Occasionally, there is a need to call devm_kfree(). But i don't see > anything here why it is needed. So i would drop your devm_kfree(), and > if you feel like it, add an additional patch removing the existing > one.
OK, will do as you suggest. > Thanks > Andrew > Thanks, Maciej