Only patch 4 can be merged to stable, please ignore cc-stable in the rest. ------------------ Original ------------------ From: "Christoph Hellwig"<[email protected]>; Date: Fri, Nov 3, 2017 01:14 PM To: "陈华才"<[email protected]>; Cc: "Marek Szyprowski"<[email protected]>; "Christoph Hellwig"<[email protected]>; "Robin Murphy"<[email protected]>; "Andrew Morton"<[email protected]>; "Fuxin Zhang"<[email protected]>; "linux-kernel"<[email protected]>; "Ralf Baechle"<[email protected]>; "JamesHogan"<[email protected]>; "linux-mips"<[email protected]>; "James E . J .Bottomley"<[email protected]>; "Martin K . Petersen"<[email protected]>; "linux-scsi"<[email protected]>; "stable"<[email protected]>; "Michael S . Tsirkin"<[email protected]>; "Pawel Osciak"<[email protected]>; "Kyungmin Park"<[email protected]>; "Michael Chan"<[email protected]>; "Benjamin Herrenschmidt"<[email protected]>; "Ivan Mikhaylov"<[email protected]>; "Tariq Toukan"<[email protected]>; "Andy Gross"<[email protected]>; "Mark A . Greer"<[email protected]>; "RobertBaldyga"<[email protected]>; Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 1/4] dma-mapping: Rework dma_get_cache_alignment()
I can queue 1 up in the dma-mapping tree, and if I get reviews for the mips and scsi bits I'd be happy to queue those up as well. But I think you'd be better off moving patches 3 and 4 to the front without the dma_get_cache_alignment prototype change so that they can be merged to stable.
