Hi Rafael,
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> On Thursday, November 2, 2017 12:00:27 AM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> This series is a replacement for commit 0cc2b4e5a020 (PM / QoS: Fix device
>> resume latency PM QoS) that had to be reverted due to problems introduced by
>> it.
>>
>> This time the genpd PM QoS governor is first updated to be more consistent
>> and the PM QoS changes are made on top of that which simplifies the second
>> patch quite a bit.
>>
>> This is based on the linux-next branch from linux-pm.git as of now (should
>> also apply to the current mainline just fine).
>>
>> Please test if you can or let me know if you have any comments.
>
> The v2 removes a couple of redundant checks from the first patch (and add
> comments to explain why the checks are not needed) and fixes up the
> "no constraint" value collision with a valid constraint multiplied by
> NSEC_PER_USEC in the second patch.
>
> Please test if possible and let me know about any issues.
With this series, the 3 issues I reported before do not happen.
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+rene...@glider.be>
Thank you.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
