On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 07:48:06AM +0300, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > Regarding CONFIG_* options, I would expect most of the configuration > changes to be equally valid for both GCC's and Clang's LTO support. > Sami, I don't think it's fair to ask you to support both Clang and GCC in > your patchset, but, where changes are obviously toolchain-agnostic, could > you use CONFIG_LTO? And use CONFIG_LTO_CLANG for Clang-specific parts?
Sure, using CONFIG_LTO for common code and CONFIG_LTO_CLANG for clang- specific parts sounds good. Sami
