Hi Nickey, Thank you for the patch.
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:47:55 EET Brian Norris wrote: > From: Nickey Yang <[email protected]> > > We might include additional ports in derivative device trees, so the > 'port' node should have an address, and the parent 'ports' node needs > /#{addres,size}-cells. > > v4: > * keep #{address,size}-cells in both 'ports' and 'port@0' nodes > * separate from the rest of the series, since this is mostly > independent of the driver refactoring > > Signed-off-by: Nickey Yang <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi index d340b58ab184..c6dae25a3f23 > 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi > @@ -1652,7 +1652,11 @@ > status = "disabled"; > > ports { > - mipi_in: port { > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + > + mipi_in: port@0 { > + reg = <0>; > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <0>; -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
