Hi Heiko, On Monday, 4 December 2017 15:46:32 EET Heiko Stuebner wrote: > Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2017, 15:22:07 CET schrieb Laurent Pinchart: > > On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:47:55 EET Brian Norris wrote: > > > From: Nickey Yang <[email protected]> > > > > > > We might include additional ports in derivative device trees, so the > > > 'port' node should have an address, and the parent 'ports' node needs > > > /#{addres,size}-cells. > > > > > > v4: > > > * keep #{address,size}-cells in both 'ports' and 'port@0' nodes > > > * separate from the rest of the series, since this is mostly > > > > > > independent of the driver refactoring > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nickey Yang <[email protected]> > > > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]> > > > > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]> > > As I hadn't pushed that one yet, I've amended it with your Review-tag :-)
Thank you :-) -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
