Rob
On 12/06/2017 03:52 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 07:36:37AM -0600, Dan Murphy wrote:
>> Fix the address-cells and size-cells example node
>> to reflect to the correct representation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt
>> index fdc40e354a64..8a49ccfec29b 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt
>> @@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ Example
>> =======
>>
>> as3645a@30 {
>> - #address-cells: 1
>> - #size-cells: 0
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> reg = <0x30>;
>> compatible = "ams,as3645a";
>
> Convention is also we put compatible first.
>
OK I will move that too for v2.
Can that be in the same patch or do you want a separate patch?
Dan
>> flash@0 {
>> --
>> 2.15.0.124.g7668cbc60
>>
--
------------------
Dan Murphy
