On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Dan Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > Rob > > On 12/06/2017 03:52 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 07:36:37AM -0600, Dan Murphy wrote: >>> Fix the address-cells and size-cells example node >>> to reflect to the correct representation. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt | 4 ++-- >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt >>> index fdc40e354a64..8a49ccfec29b 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ams,as3645a.txt >>> @@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ Example >>> ======= >>> >>> as3645a@30 { >>> - #address-cells: 1 >>> - #size-cells: 0 >>> + #address-cells = <1>; >>> + #size-cells = <0>; >>> reg = <0x30>; >>> compatible = "ams,as3645a"; >> >> Convention is also we put compatible first. >> > > OK I will move that too for v2. > > Can that be in the same patch or do you want a separate patch?
Same patch is fine. Rob
