On Wed, 6 Dec 2017, Sargun Dhillon wrote: > Should I respin this patch sans module unloading? Still a set of dynamic > hooks that are independent to allow for sealable memory support.
Yes, please. > I'm also wondering what people think of the fs change? I don't think > that it makes a lot of sense just having one giant list. I was thinking > it might make more sense using the module_name instead. I don't know how useful this will be in practice. Who/what will be looking at these entries and why? -- James Morris <[email protected]>
