On Thu, 7 Dec 2017, David Rientjes wrote:

> I'm backporting and testing the following patch against Linus's tree.  To 
> clarify an earlier point, we don't actually have any change from upstream 
> code that allows for free_pgtables() before the 
> set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP);down_write();up_write() cycle.
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/oom.h b/include/linux/oom.h
> --- a/include/linux/oom.h
> +++ b/include/linux/oom.h
> @@ -66,6 +66,15 @@ static inline bool tsk_is_oom_victim(struct task_struct * 
> tsk)
>       return tsk->signal->oom_mm;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Use this helper if tsk->mm != mm and the victim mm needs a special
> + * handling. This is guaranteed to stay true after once set.
> + */
> +static inline bool mm_is_oom_victim(struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> +     return test_bit(MMF_OOM_VICTIM, &mm->flags);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Checks whether a page fault on the given mm is still reliable.
>   * This is no longer true if the oom reaper started to reap the
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/coredump.h b/include/linux/sched/coredump.h
> --- a/include/linux/sched/coredump.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/coredump.h
> @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ static inline int get_dumpable(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  #define MMF_HUGE_ZERO_PAGE   23      /* mm has ever used the global huge 
> zero page */
>  #define MMF_DISABLE_THP              24      /* disable THP for all VMAs */
>  #define MMF_DISABLE_THP_MASK (1 << MMF_DISABLE_THP)
> +#define MMF_OOM_VICTIM               25      /* mm is the oom victim */
>  
>  #define MMF_INIT_MASK                (MMF_DUMPABLE_MASK | 
> MMF_DUMP_FILTER_MASK |\
>                                MMF_DISABLE_THP_MASK)
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -3019,20 +3019,20 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
>       /* Use -1 here to ensure all VMAs in the mm are unmapped */
>       unmap_vmas(&tlb, vma, 0, -1);
>  
> -     set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags);
> -     if (unlikely(tsk_is_oom_victim(current))) {
> +     if (unlikely(mm_is_oom_victim(mm))) {
>               /*
>                * Wait for oom_reap_task() to stop working on this
>                * mm. Because MMF_OOM_SKIP is already set before
>                * calling down_read(), oom_reap_task() will not run
>                * on this "mm" post up_write().
>                *
> -              * tsk_is_oom_victim() cannot be set from under us
> +              * mm_is_oom_victim() cannot be set from under us
>                * either because current->mm is already set to NULL
>                * under task_lock before calling mmput and oom_mm is
>                * set not NULL by the OOM killer only if current->mm
>                * is found not NULL while holding the task_lock.
>                */
> +             set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags);
>               down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
>               up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
>       }
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -683,8 +683,10 @@ static void mark_oom_victim(struct task_struct *tsk)
>               return;
>  
>       /* oom_mm is bound to the signal struct life time. */
> -     if (!cmpxchg(&tsk->signal->oom_mm, NULL, mm))
> +     if (!cmpxchg(&tsk->signal->oom_mm, NULL, mm)) {
>               mmgrab(tsk->signal->oom_mm);
> +             set_bit(MMF_OOM_VICTIM, &mm->flags);
> +     }
>  
>       /*
>        * Make sure that the task is woken up from uninterruptible sleep
> 

This passes all functional testing that I have and I can create a 
synthetic testcase that can trigger at least MMF_OOM_VICTIM getting set 
while oom_reaper is still working on an mm that this prevents, so feel 
free to add an

        Acked-by: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com>

with a variant of your previous changelogs.  Thanks!

I think it would appropriate to cc stable for 4.14 and add a

Fixes: 212925802454 ("mm: oom: let oom_reap_task and exit_mmap run 
concurrently")

if nobody disagrees, which I think you may have already done on a previous 
iteration.

We can still discuss if there are any VM_LOCKED subtleties in the this 
thread, but I have no evidence that it is responsible for any issues.

Reply via email to