Hi! > It's this allocation domain mask hook which has been bypassed by the > offending commit. The existing approach is more robust in the face of > relaxed adherence to destination cpumasks since it's all-inclusive, > whereas the new code is exclusive to a specific cpu. > > Is it possible what I'm observing is just another manifestation of > what's being described in that comment? This is a core 2 duo, so not > hyper-threaded. But maybe something funny happens when switching > cstates in response to interrupts - like maybe the wrong cpu can be used > if it can save power vs. powering up another? Just thinking out loud > here. > > In any case, 4.15-rc4 is quite unusable on my machine because of this. > > Pavel, do you observe the same behavior on your x60, WRT AC power?
No.. no Monitor-Mwait messages, and audio works if I unplug AC.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
