>>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+rene...@glider.be>
>>> [Ulf: Converted to use the WAKEUP_PATH driver PM flag]
>
> Ulf: + killing the DEV_PM_OPS define, increasing kernel size if PM_SUSPEND=n?

Oh, yes - correct!

The code looks nicer, with the penalty of one static struct declared
and not used, in case CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is unset.

Should I revert back to your proposal, I am fine with whatever?

[...]

Kind regards
Uffe

Reply via email to