On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:04 AM, Minchan Kim <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry for the delay. I have missed this until now. ;-(
No worries, figured patches would need a post holiday bump for review. > > On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Nick Desaulniers > <[email protected]> wrote: >> - link->next = -1 << OBJ_TAG_BITS; >> + link->next = -1U << OBJ_TAG_BITS; > > -1UL? Oops, good catch. > Please, resend it with including Andrew Morton > <[email protected]> who merges zsmalloc patch into his tree. Will do. On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh, boy, shouldn't be rather GENMASK() / GENMASK_ULL() in a way how Thanks for the suggestion. `GENMASK(BITS_PER_LONG - 1, OBJ_TAG_BITS);` is equivalent. Whether that is more readable, I'll wait for Minchan to decide. If that's preferred, I'll make sure to credit you with the Suggested-By tag in the commit message.
