Commit-ID: 9783be2c0e90bbaceec3c471c4fb017bff7293ba Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/9783be2c0e90bbaceec3c471c4fb017bff7293ba Author: Joel Fernandes <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 07:39:43 -0800 Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> CommitDate: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:30:30 +0100
sched/fair: Correct obsolete comment about cpufreq_update_util() Since the remote cpufreq callback work, the cpufreq_update_util() call can happen from remote CPUs. The comment about local CPUs is thus obsolete. Update it accordingly. Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> Cc: Android Kernel <[email protected]> Cc: Atish Patra <[email protected]> Cc: Chris Redpath <[email protected]> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <[email protected]> Cc: EAS Dev <[email protected]> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Cc: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Cc: Juri Lelli <[email protected]> Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Morten Ramussen <[email protected]> Cc: Patrick Bellasi <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Cc: Rohit Jain <[email protected]> Cc: Saravana Kannan <[email protected]> Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <[email protected]> Cc: Steve Muckle <[email protected]> Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Vikram Mulukutla <[email protected]> Cc: Vincent Guittot <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 3e7606d..59e66a5 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -3020,9 +3020,7 @@ static inline void cfs_rq_util_change(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) /* * There are a few boundary cases this might miss but it should * get called often enough that that should (hopefully) not be - * a real problem -- added to that it only calls on the local - * CPU, so if we enqueue remotely we'll miss an update, but - * the next tick/schedule should update. + * a real problem. * * It will not get called when we go idle, because the idle * thread is a different class (!fair), nor will the utilization
