* Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> Did anyone else notice the
> 
>       [   31.068198]  ? vmalloc_sync_all+0x150/0x150
> 
> present in a bunch of the stack traces?  That should be pretty uncommon.

I thikn that's pretty unusual:

>  Is it just part of the normal do_page_fault() stack and the stack
> dumper picks up on it?

No, it should only be called by register_die_notifier(), which is not part of 
the 
regular stack dump, AFAICS.

Thanks,

        Ingo

Reply via email to