TMIO_MMC_WRPROTECT_DISABLE is equivalent to MMC_CAP2_NO_WRITE_PROTECT.
The flag is propagated as follows:
tmio_mmc_data::capabilities2 -> mmc_host::caps2
Only the difference is the TMIO_... makes tmio_mmc_get_ro() return 0
(i.e. it does not affect mmc_gpio_get_ro() at all), while MMC_CAP2_...
returns 0 before calling ->get_ro() hook (i.e. it affects both IP own
logic and GPIO detection).
The TMIO MMC drivers do not set-up gpio_ro by themselves, so gpio_ro
is obviously unused by legacy boards like this. So, this conversion
should be safe.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- newly added
Changes in v2: None
arch/sh/boards/mach-kfr2r09/setup.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/mach-kfr2r09/setup.c
b/arch/sh/boards/mach-kfr2r09/setup.c
index 5deb2d8..6af7777 100644
--- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-kfr2r09/setup.c
+++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-kfr2r09/setup.c
@@ -375,8 +375,8 @@ static struct resource kfr2r09_sh_sdhi0_resources[] = {
static struct tmio_mmc_data sh7724_sdhi0_data = {
.chan_priv_tx = (void *)SHDMA_SLAVE_SDHI0_TX,
.chan_priv_rx = (void *)SHDMA_SLAVE_SDHI0_RX,
- .flags = TMIO_MMC_WRPROTECT_DISABLE,
.capabilities = MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ,
+ .capabilities2 = MMC_CAP2_NO_WRITE_PROTECT,
};
static struct platform_device kfr2r09_sh_sdhi0_device = {
--
2.7.4
