On Sat, 2018-01-20 at 15:19 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 23:40:26 +0100
> Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > > 
> > > From an IIO sensor point of view A Gesture sensor:
> > > Outputs
> > >   A pre defined activity type
> > >           WAKE
> > >           TILT
> > >           GLANCE
> > >           PICK_UP
> > >            &
> > >            more
> > > 
> > >   A user defined activity type as "string"  
> > Pre-defined activities are easy.
> > 
> > But what about user-defined activities? We'd really like common
> > interface across different hardware... 
> Nasty to handle indeed.   It may be the best we can do initially
> at least is user_definedN or similar.  No way of constraining
> users from uploading something really odd that we can't define
> an interface for (hopping whilst holding a phone in
> their teeth?)
That's what I think also. We pre define few USER defined activities
Ids.

> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Inputs
> > >   A raw binary cdev interface to download templates/patterns  
> > ....and "raw binary" will not work across different hardware :-(.
> Sadly there probably isn't much we can do about the format being
> custom.
> Best bet would ultimately be if there was at least a standard tool
> to generate the files for different devices...
> 
Correct. This will depend on  the firmware expected format . I think
ultimately it will be standardized.

Thanks,
Srinivas

> > 
> > 
> >                                                                     
> > Pavel

Reply via email to