On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 17:09 -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> It doesn't make sense to have an indirect call thunk with esp/rsp as
> retpoline code won't work correctly with the stack pointer register.
> Removing it will help compiler writers to catch error in case such
> a thunk call is emitted incorrectly.
>
> Fixes: 76b043848fd2 ("x86/retpoline: Add initial retpoline support")
> Suggested-by: Jeff Law <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <[email protected]>Acked-by: David Woodhouse <[email protected]> I spotted that and *almost* removed it a couple of times in other refactoring, but after abandoning those I forgot to come back and do just this. Thanks.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
