* Dan Williams <[email protected]> wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -124,6 +124,11 @@ extern int __get_user_bad(void);
>
> #define __uaccess_begin() stac()
> #define __uaccess_end() clac()
> +#define __uaccess_begin_nospec() \
> +({ \
> + stac(); \
> + ifence(); \
> +})
BTW., wouldn't it be better to switch the barrier order here, i.e. to do:
ifence(); \
stac(); \
?
The reason is that stac()/clac() is usually paired, so there's a chance with
short
sequences that it would resolve with 'no externally visible changes to flags'.
Also, there's many cases where flags are modified _inside_ the STAC/CLAC
section,
so grouping them together inside a speculation atom could be beneficial.
The flip side is that if the MFENCE stalls the STAC that is ahead of it could
be
processed for 'free' - while it's always post barrier with my suggestion.
But in any case it would be nice to see a discussion of this aspect in the
changelog, even if the patch does not change.
Thanks,
Ingo
