On Tue, 30 Jan 2018, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote: > Hi, > > 2017-12-01 13:06 GMT+01:00 Enric Balletbo i Serra > <enric.balle...@collabora.com>: > > Before this patch the enable signal was set before the PWM signal and > > vice-versa on power off. This sequence is wrong, at least, it is on > > the different panels datasheets that I checked, so I inverted the sequence > > to follow the specs. > > > > For reference the following panels have the mentioned sequence: > > - N133HSE-EA1 (Innolux) > > - N116BGE (Innolux) > > - N156BGE-L21 (Innolux) > > - B101EAN0 (Auo) > > - B101AW03 (Auo) > > - LTN101NT05 (Samsung) > > - CLAA101WA01A (Chunghwa) > > > > Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balle...@collabora.com> > > Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thomp...@linaro.org> > > Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jingooh...@gmail.com> > > --- > > Changes since v4: > > - Rebase on top of mainline. > > - Add the acks from Daniel Thompson and Jingoo Han. > > Changes since v3: > > - List the part numbers for the panel checked (Daniel Thompson) > > Changes since v2: > > - Add this as a separate patch (Thierry Reding) > > Changes since v1: > > - None > > > > drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 9 +++++---- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > A gentle ping, It's been nearly two months since I sent this patchset, > there is anything else that prevents these patches to land or > incorporate in linux-next?
Looks like Daniel should Ack 2/5 since he had comments on it before and it still lacks a Backlight Ack. With regards to -next, the merge-window is open (should close in a little over a week), so the chances are, you'll get a long soak before the next merge-window opens. -- Lee Jones Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
