On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 01:03:29PM +0100, Andrea Parri wrote: > Ingo pointed out that: > > "The "memory model" name is overly generic, ambiguous and somewhat > misleading, as we usually mean the virtual memory layout/model > when we say "memory model". GCC too uses it in that sense [...]" > > Make it clearer that, in the context of tools/memory-model/, the term > "memory-model" is used as shorthand for "memory consistency model" by > calling out this convention in tools/memory-model/README. > > Stick to the full name in sources' headers and for the subsystem name. > > Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <[email protected]> > --- > tools/memory-model/MAINTAINERS | 2 +- > tools/memory-model/README | 14 +++++++------- > tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell | 2 +- > tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cat | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Will
