On 2/1/18 1:36 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Fri, 2 Feb 2018, Yang Shi wrote:

  /*
- * Allocate a new object. If the pool is empty, switch off the debugger.
+ * Allocate a new object. Retrieve from global freelist first. If the pool is
+ * empty, switch off the debugger.
   * Must be called with interrupts disabled.
   */
  static struct debug_obj *
@@ -150,6 +154,13 @@ static struct debug_obj *lookup_object(void *addr, struct 
debug_bucket *b)
        struct debug_obj *obj = NULL;
raw_spin_lock(&pool_lock);
Why in alloc_object() and not in fill_pool()?

+       if (obj_nr_tofree > 0 && (obj_pool_free < obj_pool_min_free)) {
+               obj = hlist_entry(obj_to_free.first, typeof(*obj), node);
+               obj_nr_tofree--;
+               hlist_del(&obj->node);
+               goto out;
+       }
Errm. This is wrong. It does not reinitialize the object. Please do that
shuffling in fill_pool().

OK, will move the reuse logic into fill_pool().


        if (obj_pool.first) {
                obj         = hlist_entry(obj_pool.first, typeof(*obj), node);
....

+       /* When pool list is not full move free objs to pool list */
+       while (obj_pool_free < debug_objects_pool_size) {
+               if (obj_nr_tofree <= 0)
+                       break;
+
+               obj = hlist_entry(obj_to_free.first, typeof(*obj), node);
+               hlist_del(&obj->node);
+               hlist_add_head(&obj->node, &obj_pool);
+               obj_pool_free++;
+               obj_pool_used--;
+               obj_nr_tofree--;
+       }
+
+       /*
+        * pool list is already full, and there are still objs on the free list,
+        * move remaining free objs to a separate list to free the memory later.
+        */
+       if (obj_nr_tofree > 0) {
+               hlist_move_list(&obj_to_free, &tofree);
+               obj_nr_tofree = 0;
+       }
The accounting is inconsistent. You leak obj_pool_used. But that's wrong
anyway because an object should not be accounted for in two places. It's
only on _ONE_ list....

So I should move the accounting to where the obj is deleted from the list? It should look like:

if (obj_nr_tofree > 0)
        hlist_move_list(&obj_to_free, &tofree);

...

if (!hlist_empty(&tofree)) {
                hlist_for_each_entry_safe(obj, tmp, &tofree, node) {
                        hlist_del(&obj->node);
                        obj_nr_tofree--;
                        kmem_cache_free(obj_cache, obj);
                }
        }


@@ -716,7 +762,6 @@ static void __debug_check_no_obj_freed(const void *address, 
unsigned long size)
  {
        unsigned long flags, oaddr, saddr, eaddr, paddr, chunks;
        struct hlist_node *tmp;
-       HLIST_HEAD(freelist);
        struct debug_obj_descr *descr;
        enum debug_obj_state state;
        struct debug_bucket *db;
@@ -752,18 +797,17 @@ static void __debug_check_no_obj_freed(const void 
*address, unsigned long size)
                                goto repeat;
                        default:
                                hlist_del(&obj->node);
-                               hlist_add_head(&obj->node, &freelist);
+                               /* Put obj on the global free list */
+                               raw_spin_lock(&pool_lock);
+                               hlist_add_head(&obj->node, &obj_to_free);
+                               /* Update the counter of objs on the global 
freelist */
+                               obj_nr_tofree++;
+                               raw_spin_unlock(&pool_lock);
As we have to take pool_lock anyway, we simply can change free_object() to:

static bool __free_object(obj)
{
        bool work;

        lock(pool);
        work = obj_pool_free > debug_objects_pool_size && obj_cache;
        obj_pool_used++;
        if (work) {
                obj_nr_tofree++;
                hlist_add_head(&obj->node, &obj_to_free);
        ] else {
                obj_pool_free++;
                hlist_add_head(&obj->node, &obj_pool);
        }
        unlock(pool);
        return work;
}

static void free_object(obj)
{
        if (__free_object(obj))
                schedule_work(&debug_obj_work);
}

and then use __free_object() in __debug_check_no_obj_freed()

         bool work = false;

         ...
                 work |= __free_object(obj);
         ...

         if (work)
                schedule_work(&debug_obj_work);

That makes the whole thing simpler and the accounting is matching the place
where the object is:

       obj_pool_free counts the number of objects enqueued in obj_pool
       obj_nr_tofree counts the number of objects enqueued in obj_to_free
       obr_pool_used counts the number of objects enqueued in the hash lists

Ideally you split that patch into pieces:

1) Introduce obj_to_free/obj_nr_tofree and add the removing/freeing from it
    in fill_pool() and free_obj_work(). Nothing adds an object at this point
    to obj_to_free.

2) Change free_object() to use obj_to_free and split it apart

3) Change __debug_check_no_obj_freed() to use __free_object()

That makes it simpler to review and to follow.

Hmm?

Sure, will refactor free_object() and split the patches in newer version.

Thanks,
Yang


Thanks,

        tglx

Reply via email to