On 02/07/2018 07:45 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszew...@baylibre.com>Add a simple document for the DaVinci genpd driver. We use clock pm exclusively hence no reg property. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszew...@baylibre.com> --- .../devicetree/bindings/soc/ti,davinci-pm-domains.txt | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti,davinci-pm-domains.txt diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti,davinci-pm-domains.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti,davinci-pm-domains.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..935d063c7b35 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti,davinci-pm-domains.txt @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +Device tree bindings for the genpd driver for Texas Instruments DaVinci SoCs + +Required properties: + +- compatible: must be "ti,davinci-pm-domains" +- #power-domain-cells: must be 0 + +Example: + +pwc1: power-controller@227000 { + compatible = "ti,davinci-pm-domains"; + #power-domain-cells = <0>; +};
We already have the PSC @227000. Why not just add #power-domain-cells = <0>; to that node instead of creating a new "device" when this is really the same device?
