On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 10:26:16AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> So once upon a time I set out to fix the problem reported by Tobin wherein
> a literal block within a kerneldoc comment would be corrupted in
> processing. On the way, though, I got annoyed at the way I have to learn
> how kernel-doc works from the beginning every time I tear into it.
Awesome. The patch that exposed that problem hasn't landed yet but I
tested this series and can confirm that it fixes it.
FTR to test I did:
- update function docs for include/linux/rcupdate.h:rcu_pointer_hadoff()
removed enclosing '``' and added leading '::'
- apply this series
- rebuild docs
- profit
thanks,
Tobin.
