On 02/12/18 03:12 PM, Junaid Shahid wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
>
> On 02/12/2018 11:51 AM, Dave Watson wrote:
>
> > +static int gcmaes_encrypt_sg(struct aead_request *req, unsigned int
> > assoclen,
> > + u8 *hash_subkey, u8 *iv, void *aes_ctx)
> >
> > +static int gcmaes_decrypt_sg(struct aead_request *req, unsigned int
> > assoclen,
> > + u8 *hash_subkey, u8 *iv, void *aes_ctx)
>
> These two functions are almost identical. Wouldn't it be better to combine
> them into a single encrypt/decrypt function, similar to what you have done
> for the assembly macros?
>
> > + if (((struct crypto_aes_ctx *)aes_ctx)->key_length != AES_KEYSIZE_128 ||
> > + aesni_gcm_enc_tfm == aesni_gcm_enc) {
>
> Shouldn't we also include a check for the buffer length being less than
> AVX_GEN2_OPTSIZE? AVX will not be used in that case either.
Yes, these both sound reasonable. I will send a V2.
Thanks!
