On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 08:41:43AM +0000, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> Marina, Kees:
> I think the combination of LKML and the LLVM developer's list is probably
> too large a set of folks to have a (somewhat) lengthy exploration of
> options and how to go about this and find a good path forward.

Why is there any need to discuss "options" here?  What is preventing the
implementation of "asm goto" in llvm?  Is it the lack of a working
patch, or something else?


greg k-h

Reply via email to