On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 08:41:43AM +0000, Chandler Carruth wrote: > Marina, Kees: > > I think the combination of LKML and the LLVM developer's list is probably > too large a set of folks to have a (somewhat) lengthy exploration of > options and how to go about this and find a good path forward.
Why is there any need to discuss "options" here? What is preventing the implementation of "asm goto" in llvm? Is it the lack of a working patch, or something else? thanks, greg k-h