On 14/02/2018 05:42, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>>> +bool kvm_valid_msr_feature(u32 msr, u64 data)
>>> +{
>>> +   unsigned int i;
>>> +
>>> +   for (i = 0; i < num_msr_based_features; i++) {
>>> +           struct kvm_msr_based_features *m = msr_based_features + i;
>>> +
>>> +           if (msr != m->msr)
>>> +                   continue;
>>> +
>>> +           /* Make sure not trying to change unsupported bits */
>>> +           return (data & ~m->mask) ? false : true;
>>> +   }
>>> +
>>> +   return false;
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_valid_msr_feature);
>>> +
>>
>> This is probably unnecessary too (the allowed values are a bit more
>> complicated for, you just guessed it, VMX capability MSRs) and you can
>> just check bits other than LFENCE in svm_set_msr.
>
> The whole routine or just the bit checking?  I can see still needing the
> check to be sure the "feature" is present.

You can return the MSR unconditionally from KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST.
Then KVM_GET_MSR would return 0 or 1 depending on whether the feature is
present.

Paolo

Reply via email to