On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 5:04 AM, Richard Guy Briggs <r...@redhat.com> wrote:
> A bug was introduced in 8fae47705685fcaa75a1fe4c8c3e18300a702979
> ("audit: add support for session ID user filter")
> See: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/4
>
> When setting a session ID filter, the session ID filter field overwrote
> the quick pointer reference to the arch field, potentially causing the
> arch field to be misinterpreted.
>
> Passes audit-testsuite.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <r...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  kernel/auditfilter.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

Good catch.  Merged.

Looking at the original patch and audit_field_valid(), I think we
should probably look into tightening up what constitutes "valid"
fields.  For example, does it make sense to allow anything but
equal/not-equal when comparing AUDIT_SUBJ_TYPE? (note well: this is
just one example, there are many more)

* https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/73

> diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> index 4a1758a..739a6d2 100644
> --- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
> +++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> @@ -496,7 +496,6 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct 
> audit_rule_data *data,
>                         if (!gid_valid(f->gid))
>                                 goto exit_free;
>                         break;
> -               case AUDIT_SESSIONID:
>                 case AUDIT_ARCH:
>                         entry->rule.arch_f = f;
>                         break;
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com

Reply via email to