The pointer can't be NULL since it's first what has been done in the
pointer().

Remove useless checks.

Note we leave check for !CONFIG_HAVE_CLK to make compiler
to optimize code away when possible.

Cc: Petr Mladek <pmla...@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
---
 lib/vsprintf.c | 13 +------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
index 97be2d07297a..a49da00b79e7 100644
--- a/lib/vsprintf.c
+++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
@@ -819,10 +819,6 @@ char *hex_string(char *buf, char *end, u8 *addr, struct 
printf_spec spec,
                /* nothing to print */
                return buf;
 
-       if (ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(addr))
-               /* NULL pointer */
-               return string(buf, end, NULL, spec);
-
        switch (fmt[1]) {
        case 'C':
                separator = ':';
@@ -1258,10 +1254,6 @@ char *escaped_string(char *buf, char *end, u8 *addr, 
struct printf_spec spec,
        if (spec.field_width == 0)
                return buf;                             /* nothing to print */
 
-       if (ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(addr))
-               return string(buf, end, NULL, spec);    /* NULL pointer */
-
-
        do {
                switch (fmt[count++]) {
                case 'a':
@@ -1455,7 +1447,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack
 char *clock(char *buf, char *end, struct clk *clk, struct printf_spec spec,
            const char *fmt)
 {
-       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK) || !clk)
+       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK))
                return string(buf, end, NULL, spec);
 
        switch (fmt[1]) {
@@ -1580,9 +1572,6 @@ char *device_node_string(char *buf, char *end, struct 
device_node *dn,
        if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
                return string(buf, end, "(!OF)", spec);
 
-       if ((unsigned long)dn < PAGE_SIZE)
-               return string(buf, end, "(null)", spec);
-
        /* simple case without anything any more format specifiers */
        fmt++;
        if (fmt[0] == '\0' || strcspn(fmt,"fnpPFcC") > 0)
-- 
2.15.1

Reply via email to