Hi Andrzej,

On 03/02/2018 11:21 AM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 01.03.2018 10:00, Philippe CORNU wrote:
>> Hi Archit, Andrzej & Laurent,
>>
>> May I ask you please your feedback on this small patch?
>> Many thanks,
>>
>> Philippe :-)
>>
>> On 02/04/2018 10:36 PM, Philippe Cornu wrote:
>>> The readl_poll_timeout() return value is 0 in case of success
>>> so it is better to detect errors without taking care of the
>>> return value sign.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Cornu <philippe.co...@st.com>
> 
> The patch is of course correct. However I am not sure if necessary. For
> sure functionally it does not change anything.
> AFAIK kernel CodingStyle says nothing about it, so I suppose it is
> matter of personal taste.

I sent this tiny patch in order to homogenize the dw mipi driver because 
there were both cases "if (ret)" & "if (ret < 0)" in the source code.

I did not really find a preferred way in the kernel source code so I 
selected what sounds the best to me ie "if (ret)" but it is not a 
problem to make another patch for "if (ret < 0)" everywhere :-)

In any case, the most important from my pov is to have a homogeneous 
source code :-)

Does anyone have a preferred choice between "if (ret)" & "if (ret < 0)" 
after a "ret = readl_poll_timeout()"?

> Anyway I can give it:
> Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.ha...@samsung.com>

Many thanks,
Philippe :)

> 
>   --
> Regards
> Andrzej
> 
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c | 10 +++++-----
>>>    1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c 
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c
>>> index 65aeb3f78b48..4d0e8471a15c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c
>>> @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_gen_pkt_hdr_write(struct 
>>> dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, u32 hdr_val)
>>>     ret = qq(dsi->base + DSI_CMD_PKT_STATUS,
>>>                              val, !(val & GEN_CMD_FULL), 1000,
>>>                              CMD_PKT_STATUS_TIMEOUT_US);
>>> -   if (ret < 0) {
>>> +   if (ret) {
>>>             dev_err(dsi->dev, "failed to get available command FIFO\n");
>>>             return ret;
>>>     }
>>> @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_gen_pkt_hdr_write(struct 
>>> dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, u32 hdr_val)
>>>     ret = readl_poll_timeout(dsi->base + DSI_CMD_PKT_STATUS,
>>>                              val, (val & mask) == mask,
>>>                              1000, CMD_PKT_STATUS_TIMEOUT_US);
>>> -   if (ret < 0) {
>>> +   if (ret) {
>>>             dev_err(dsi->dev, "failed to write command FIFO\n");
>>>             return ret;
>>>     }
>>> @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_write(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi,
>>>             ret = readl_poll_timeout(dsi->base + DSI_CMD_PKT_STATUS,
>>>                                      val, !(val & GEN_PLD_W_FULL), 1000,
>>>                                      CMD_PKT_STATUS_TIMEOUT_US);
>>> -           if (ret < 0) {
>>> +           if (ret) {
>>>                     dev_err(dsi->dev,
>>>                             "failed to get available write payload FIFO\n");
>>>                     return ret;
>>> @@ -716,13 +716,13 @@ static void dw_mipi_dsi_dphy_enable(struct 
>>> dw_mipi_dsi *dsi)
>>>    
>>>     ret = readl_poll_timeout(dsi->base + DSI_PHY_STATUS, val,
>>>                              val & PHY_LOCK, 1000, PHY_STATUS_TIMEOUT_US);
>>> -   if (ret < 0)
>>> +   if (ret)
>>>             DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to wait phy lock state\n");
>>>    
>>>     ret = readl_poll_timeout(dsi->base + DSI_PHY_STATUS,
>>>                              val, val & PHY_STOP_STATE_CLK_LANE, 1000,
>>>                              PHY_STATUS_TIMEOUT_US);
>>> -   if (ret < 0)
>>> +   if (ret)
>>>             DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to wait phy clk lane stop state\n");
>>>    }
>>>    
> 
> 

Reply via email to