On 03/02/2018 10:39 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2018-03-02 10:29:56 [-0600], Haris Okanovic wrote:
Could please point me to the code/patches or something?

I rebase onto v4.14.20-rt17, running some sanity test before reposting to ml
(cyclictest & Anna's timertest). Will post V4 sometime today (US Central
Time) if everything goes well.

Are you also asking for a 4.9 version? I'm fine leaving it out of 4.9.

Hmmm. Maybe this is a form of miscommunication here :)

Yea, I agree :) Let me try to summarize: When I originally asked this question back in March, rt was on 4.9. I was asking back then to pull the V3 revision of my timer patch (replacing the old V2). Given that RT already moved to 4.14 in the meantime, backed out V3, and V3 no longer applies 4.14, I'm fine leaving everything as-is! I post a V4 (for 4.14) when I finish retesting it.

So my understanding is that you complain/ask why there is an older
version of the patch still in v4.9-RT:

|It was added back into 4.9 at some point after v4.9.30-rt20. I see an older
|version in v4.9.68-rt60, for example, hence my original email. It was dropped
|sometime thereafter, presumably because it no longer cleanly applies. I don't
|see it in v4.14.20-rt17, for example.

So I ask where you see the old version of your patch in v4.9-RT. Yes it
was added, then removed and it never appeared back in. However, I don't
see anymore in v4.9.68-rt60.

-- Haris


Reply via email to