On Tue, 06 Mar 2018 21:22:30 +0000
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchi...@codethink.co.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 09:50 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> > ------------------
> > From: Sascha Hauer <s.ha...@pengutronix.de>
> > [ Upstream commit fdf2e821052958a114618a95ab18a300d0b080cb ]
> > When erased subpages are read then the BCH decoder returns STATUS_ERASED
> > if they are all empty, or STATUS_UNCORRECTABLE if there are bitflips.
> > When there are bitflips, we have to set these bits again to show the
> > upper layers a completely erased page. When a bitflip happens in the
> > exact byte where the bad block marker is, then this byte is swapped
> > with another byte in block_mark_swapping(). The correction code then
> > detects a bitflip in another subpage and no longer corrects the bitflip
> > where it really happens.
> This seesm to be a bug fix for commit bd2e778c9ee3 "gpmi-nand: Handle
> ECC Errors in erased pages". That's not in 4.4 so the bug fix is not
> needed, though it doesn't appear to do any harm.
I wonder why the fix was backported to stable releases in the first
place. AFAICS, there's no Cc-stable or Fixes tag in the original
commit. It's probably something in the backport-to-stable process I'm
not aware of.
Anyway, not an issues since the changes seems to be harmless.
Boris Brezillon, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering