* Dominik Brodowski <li...@dominikbrodowski.net> wrote: > Shuffle the cond_syscall() entries in kernel/sys_ni.c around so that they > are kept in the same order as in include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h. For > better structuring, add the same comments as in that file, but keep a few > additional comments and extend the commentary where it seems useful. > > Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <li...@dominikbrodowski.net> > > diff --git a/kernel/sys_ni.c b/kernel/sys_ni.c > index b5189762d275..44c65e4d2528 100644 > --- a/kernel/sys_ni.c > +++ b/kernel/sys_ni.c > @@ -17,245 +17,403 @@ asmlinkage long sys_ni_syscall(void) > return -ENOSYS; > } > > -cond_syscall(sys_quotactl); > -cond_syscall(sys32_quotactl); > -cond_syscall(sys_acct); > +/* > + * This list is kept in the same order as include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h. > + * Architecture specific entries go below, then follow deprecated or obsolote > + * system calls.
That's both a typo and wrong: 'follow' in this context means the exact opposite ordering. I think this is more accurate: * Architecture specific entries go below, followed by deprecated or obsolete * system calls. Thanks, Ingo