On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 02:11:12PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Thu, 08 Mar 2018 13:03:03 PST (-0800), [email protected] wrote: > >On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 10:33:49AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > > >[...] > > > >>I'm going to go produce a new set of spinlocks, I think it'll be a bit more > >>coherent then. > >> > >>I'm keeping your other patch in my queue for now, it generally looks good > >>but I haven't looked closely yet. > > > >Patches 1 and 2 address a same issue ("release-to-acquire"); this is also > >expressed, more or less explicitly, in the corresponding commit messages: > >it might make sense to "queue" them together, and to build the new locks > >on top of these (even if this meant "rewrite all of/a large portion of > >spinlock.h"...). > > I agree. IIRC you had a fixup to the first pair of patches, can you submit > a v2?
I've just sent it (with updated changelog). Andrea
