On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 01:37:43PM +0000, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
> index 5c7df1df81ff..a0312d73f575 100644
> --- a/fs/dcache.c
> +++ b/fs/dcache.c
> @@ -273,8 +273,16 @@ static void __d_free(struct rcu_head *head)
>  static void __d_free_external(struct rcu_head *head)
>  {
>       struct dentry *dentry = container_of(head, struct dentry, d_u.d_rcu);
> -     kfree(external_name(dentry));
> -     kmem_cache_free(dentry_cache, dentry); 
> +     struct external_name *name = external_name(dentry);
> +     unsigned long bytes;
> +
> +     bytes = dentry->d_name.len + offsetof(struct external_name, name[1]);
> +     mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(virt_to_page(name)),
> +                         NR_INDIRECTLY_RECLAIMABLE_BYTES,
> +                         -kmalloc_size(kmalloc_index(bytes)));
> +
> +     kfree(name);
> +     kmem_cache_free(dentry_cache, dentry);
>  }

That can't be right - external names can be freed in 
release_dentry_name_snapshot()
and copy_name() as well.  When do you want kfree_rcu() paths accounted for, BTW?
At the point where we are freeing them, or where we are scheduling their 
freeing?

Reply via email to