On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:15 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 13-03-18, 11:35, Claudio Scordino wrote:
>> When the SCHED_DEADLINE scheduling class increases the CPU utilization,
>> we should not wait for the rate limit, otherwise we may miss some
>> deadline.
>>
>> Tests using rt-app on Exynos5422 with up to 10 SCHED_DEADLINE tasks have
>> shown reductions of even 10% of deadline misses with a negligible
>> increase of energy consumption (measured through Baylibre Cape).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Claudio Scordino <clau...@evidence.eu.com>
>> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
>> CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
>> CC: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
>> CC: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bell...@arm.com>
>> CC: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggem...@arm.com>
>> CC: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmus...@arm.com>
>> CC: Juri Lelli <juri.le...@redhat.com>
>> CC: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guit...@linaro.org>
>> CC: Todd Kjos <tk...@android.com>
>> CC: Joel Fernandes <joe...@google.com>
>> CC: linux...@vger.kernel.org
>> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>> Changes from v3:
>>  - Specific routine renamed as ignore_dl_rate_limit()
>
> LGTM. Thanks.

Nice! Thanks.

- Joel

Reply via email to